Posted | by David Moenning |
The Good News: Valuations Are Improving image

Due to system maintenance, updates to several key data/models in our indicator boards were not available over the weekend. Thus, our weekly review of market indicators will be postponed until tomorrow morning. But as the title of this morning's missive indicates, there is some good news to report to start the week.

To be sure, the mood on Wall Street has soured lately. Instead of looking ahead to all the good stuff that is likely to occur in the next calendar year and enjoying the traditional year-end rally (aka the Santa Claus rally), traders are focused on the negative. And while things can certainly change in the markets, this has been the worst start to a December since... wait for it... 2008. Argh.

With all the talk about slowing global growth (lest we forget, Germany, Japan, and Switzerland all reported negative GDP results last quarter), slowing earnings, slowing job growth, the trade war, the political risks, peak iPhone, higher rates, the Fed, slower home sales, another big drop in oil, the end of the buy-the-dip era, and of course, when the next recession/crisis will hit the U.S., it is easy to see the market's glass as half-empty here.

However, there is some good news to consider. Valuations have definitely improved.

No, stocks are not cheap. But on a price-to-earnings basis, I'll argue that stocks are no longer extremely overvalued either. And from a macro perspective, this is indeed a good thing.

To be clear, P/E Ratios are not the only way to measure market valuation. And by other measures, such as Price-to-Sales, stocks remain at nosebleed levels. However, the granddaddy of valuation metrics, the Price-to-Earnings ratio, has been getting better.

If you think about what has transpired over the past year or so, this makes sense. The "P" (Price) in the P/E Ratio has gone almost nowhere in 2018. Yet, at the same time, the "E" (Earnings) has soared. As such, it shouldn't be surprising to see the P/E moving down.

For example, below is one of my favorite versions of the P/E ratio. Instead of using the entire S&P 500, this approach uses the P/E of the median stock. I.E. The midsection of the market. Half above and half below. Take a look at the chart below:

S&P 500 Median P/E Ratio

View Larger Chart Online
Source: Ned Davis Research Group

See what I mean? Granted, a median P/E of 21.4 ain't cheap. But it isn't expensive/overvalued either. And this is especially true when looking back over the last 20 years.

As I've opined many times in the past, I believe there are two distinct "eras" on the valuation charts. The first era that spans until the mid-1990s. And the second era since.

If you want to look at the glass as at least half-full here, you can even argue that in the current era, the Median P/E Ratio for the S&P is about average. And given the expectations for earnings to continue to grow, unless the U.S. stumbles into recession or another crisis crops up, there is room for stocks to move higher.

Exhibit B is the P/E Ratio of NDR's Multicap Institutional Stock Index. This looks at a broad swath of the stocks large enough for institutional investors to own.

Multicap Equity Index P/E Ratio

View Larger Chart Online
Source: Ned Davis Research Group

Here the P/E ratio has pulled back from the overvalued range and is back to where it stood in 2014-15.

The next chart looks at the P/E Ratio of the Value Line Index, which is arguably one of the broadest indices around.

Value Line Index P/E Ratio

View Larger Chart Online
Source: Ned Davis Research Group

On this chart, the "new era" in valuations beginning in 1995 or so, is fairly easy to see. It is also worth noting that the current P/E on the Value Line Index is closing in on where it was at the beginning of 2016. And if you recall, this was when the last "mini" bear ended.

Thus, the bulls can argue that while valuations could certainly continue to improve if the bears stick around a while, stocks are now approaching the valuation levels last seen prior to the most recent leg higher in the secular cycle.

Keeping The Big Picture In Perspective

On that note, I think it is important to keep the big picture in perspective here. From my seat, what we are currently experiencing is a correction that could easily morph into a bear for several more months. It happens.

But we do NOT believe the secular bull that began on March 9, 2009 is at risk here. Barring an external event or a new crisis, we should keep in mind that the economy of the U.S. is still chugging along and likely to continue to do so.

Sure, growth can become uneven and slow down from time to time. And as a discounting mechanism of future expectations, the stock market is always on the lookout for slowing growth. This is likely what we are seeing now.

Yet we should also remember that even if the current corrective phase turns into a bear, the downside will likely fall into the "mini" or "baby" bear category. Remember, NDR's computers tell us that the average decline for these shorter, shallower bear phases is about 23%, and they last about 8 months.

The question at this stage of the game is, where is the bottom? Obviously, we can't know this in advance. However, keep in mind that at some point, values win out. And the good news is valuations are improving.

So, do yourself a favor and stop listening to the permabears who are screaming that the next financial crisis is coming (i.e. loss of 50%). Instead, remember that the best opportunity for gains in the stock market (aka the "easy money") occurs when bear market ends. And since we are already a couple months in, we can look forward to better days ahead.

Thought For The Day:

Do not suffer your good nature to say yes when you ought to say no. –George Washington

Wishing you green screens and all the best for a great day,

David D. Moenning
Founder, Chief Investment Officer
Heritage Capital Research


HCR Focuses on a Risk-Managed Approach to Investing
What Risk Management Can and Cannot Do


HCR Awarded Top Honors in 2018 NAAIM Shark Tank Portfolio Strategy Competition

Each year, NAAIM (National Association of Active Investment Managers) hosts a competition to identify the best actively managed investment strategies. In April, HCR's Dave Moenning took home first place for his flagship risk management strategy.

PRESS RELEASE


Disclosures

At the time of publication, Mr. Moenning held long positions in the following securities mentioned: none - Note that positions may change at any time.

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

Mr. Moenning may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Positions may change at any time.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.