Posted |

There has been a lot of talk about the fact that the S&P 500 has displayed a remarkable tendency to produce a "V bottom" during the majority of the pullbacks seen over the last couple of years. Including yesterday's action, the blue chip index has put in a total of 10 such "V bottoms" since the end of 2012. Doing the math, this means that the market has "V'd" about 5 times a year in the last two years whereas in the prior 62 years, the "V's" were seen only about once every year and a half.

The obvious point here is that something has clearly changed in the market over the last two years. And then the obvious questions include: What has changed? And is this a permanent change in the market's behavior?

Should investors blame this new pattern on HFT? Automated millisecond trend following? The proliferation of ETF trading? Or is there something else to consider?

S&P 500 - Weekly

View Larger Image

While what follows is merely conjecture and could easily be proved wrong at any time, one thought is that QE is actually to blame for the huge increase in "V bottoms."

The Mere Mention of QE Causes...

We've seen it over and over again lately. Stocks pull back on some new fear/concern/worry but then, just about the time things start to get hairy, a central bank official starts talking about QE (or monetary stimulus in the case of China).

Bam! At the drop of an algo, the fears in the market are instantly forgotten and the computers fall all over each other to jump back on the bull train.

The best example of this phenomenon was seen in mid-October. Stocks were in the process of putting in what appeared to be the first "meaningful" correction since the end of the European debt crisis and on October 15th, the S&P appeared to breach the -10 percent level for the pullback on an intraday basis.

But then it happened - a flood of QE news. First there was St. Louis Fed President James Bullard, a noted inflation hawk, who came out and said that the Fed could always halt the taper process and/or hold off on raising rates if things get bad again. Next, the Bank of Japan got into the act and upped their QE program by 60 percent. And finally Mario Draghi started openly talking about a QE program in Europe.

S&P 500 - Daily

View Larger Image

Before you could figure out whether Mr. Bullard was a voting member of the FOMC that year, stocks were off to the races. In a matter of two days the market's mood went from one of extreme fear, to something closer to jubilation. And within a matter of 2 weeks, the "meaningful" correction had turned into a new leg higher for bulls, replete with fresh new all-time highs.

QE Strikes Again

In the latest example, it was the confirmation that a QE plan in Europe will actually happen that seems to have stopped the bears in their tracks and returned the ball to the bulls.

More specifically, word that ECB President Mario Draghi had sent a letter to Eurozone Parliament members yesterday outlining the banks plans for a sovereign bond buying program gave rise to hopes that the ECB would act sooner rather than later. And since the next ECB meeting is January 22, well...

What's the Allure?

Why does QE matter, you ask? The bottom line is that the fresh cash printed by the QE programs has to go somewhere. Yes, the banking math is rather complex to follow. But as investors have learned, those new dollars, yen, and euros tend to go where they are treated best.

And as we've discussed prior, the key is that over the past couple of years, the U.S. stock and bond market have received the lion's share of that new "fund flow."

So, with the ECB readying to launch a QE plan - regardless of whether it is this month or next - investors are thinking that the new cash flow trumps any worry about the crash in oil, the potential for disinflation, and/or the global slowdown. At least for now, anyway...

Turning To This Morning

To be sure, the focus of this market remains QE expectations in Europe. Well, up until the jobs report is released, that is. Today, traders in Europe are focused on/concerned about the possibility that the ECB's QE program could be watered down. As such, yesterday's raucous rally has turned into a pullback. In addition, the manhunt in France has produced two hostage situations in Paris this morning. On the economic front, all eyes are on the Nonfarm Payrolls report, which could easily influence trading here in the U.S. At this point, futures point to a lower open on Wall Street.

Pre-Game Indicators

Here are the Pre-Market indicators we review each morning before the opening bell...

Major Foreign Markets:
    Japan: +0.18%
    Hong Kong: +0.35%
    Shanghai: -0.26%
    London: -0.49%
    Germany: -0.61%
    France: -0.64%
    Italy: -1.07%
    Spain: -2.81%

Crude Oil Futures: -0.17 to $48.62

Gold: +$4.10 at $1212.60

Dollar: lower against the yen and pound, higher against the euro

10-Year Bond Yield: Currently trading at 2.001%

Stock Indices in U.S. (relative to fair value):
    S&P 500: -6.84
    Dow Jones Industrial Average: -69
    NASDAQ Composite: -9.30

Thought For The Day:

"Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally." John Maynard Keynes

Positions in securities mentioned: None

Wishing you green screens and all the best for a great day,

David D. Moenning
President, Chief Investment Officer
Heritage Capital Research
Check Out the NEW Website!

Investment Advisory Services Offered Through CONCERT Wealth Management, Inc. An SEC Registered Investment Advisor

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning’s opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

David D. Moenning, an advisor representative of CONCERT Wealth Management Inc. (CONCERT), is founder of Heritage Capital Advisors LLC, a legal business entity doing business as Heritage Capital Research (Heritage). Advisory services are offered through CONCERT Wealth Management, Inc., an SEC registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services review the CONCERT firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available from your Investment Representative or by contacting Heritage or CONCERT.

Mr. Moenning is also the owner of Heritage Capital Management (HCM) a state-registered investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Neither HCM, Heritage, or CONCERT is registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of Heritage and HCM may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or Heritage/HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.