Posted |

Earlier in the week, I wrote about the importance of identifying one's time frame when trying to win in Ms. Market's game. As I opined, trying to use a long-term approach to succeed from a short-term perspective can cause a great deal of both emotional and financial pain. As such, it is critical to know which of the three major time frames you are focusing on: Short-, Intermediate-, or Long-term. And it is for this reason that every couple of weeks, we attempt to succinctly summarize the outlook for all three.

So let's review. From a short-term perspective, I've written that the trend is clearly a friend to the bulls right now. However, stocks are indeed overbought, sentiment has become too upbeat/complacent, and the seasonal cycle becomes a headwind from next week into early October. As such, I've suggested that investors plan accordingly and be prepared to buy the dip (or to put money to work in their portfolios for the long-term).

Looking out over the next 3-6 months, we believe the keys include the outlook for both earnings and the economy as well as the state of Fed policy. So, given that (a) the recent economic data (including this week's LEI) has been decent and supports the prospects for further growth, (b) earnings are expected to perk up during the next reporting season (remember, oil has been a major reason for the earnings recession and oil is now moving higher), and (c) that global central banks continue to implement their QE programs, it is hard to be overly negative on the market.

From a longer-term point of view, we contend that stocks embarked on a new cyclical bull market on February 12, 2016. And as we've discussed, this new cyclical bull is occurring within the context of the secular bull trend that began on March 9, 2009. If we let history be our guide, this means that the cyclical bull should be stronger and longer than average and any cyclical bears that occur along the way (such as those we saw in 2011 and from August 2015 through February 11, 2016) should be shorter and shallower than average.

However, the bears contend that valuations are a big problem (the goal from our furry friends here is to conjure up memories/fears of 2000) and that we should be worried about the election.

On the first score, there is really no denying the fact that the absolute valuation metrics such as Price-to-Earnings/Dividends/Cash Flow/Book Value are at very high levels.

Yet it is important to note that when interest rates and the economic backdrop are taken into account, valuations are not at extreme levels. In fact, when considering the "relative valuation" of stocks and interest rates, the current levels are actually quite bullish.

Then when you consider the fact that the economy is growing and earnings are improving, even the absolute valuation picture doesn't look so bad. And unless we see a 1999-style surge in prices or a very large spike in interest rates, we are of the opinion that valuations are not a reason to avoid stocks - even at these lofty levels.

For me, the bottom line here is the issue of valuation lies in the eyes of the beholder. So, you can either take defensive action now on the assumption that this won't end well -or- decide to ride the bull train until there are signs that valuations matter to the market (such as when the economy weakens, inflation perks up, or the Fed gets aggressive).

As for the much ballyhooed election worries, I believe it is important to keep in mind that Wall Street really doesn't care which side wins the White House in November. No, from a stock market perspective, presidential elections are really about expectations and/or uncertainty. And with Clinton leading in the polls of many key battle ground states, there doesn't appear to be much fear or uncertainty in the market at this time. However, if the race tightens or if candidates start to talk about implementing pans that would be considered anti-growth, this situation could change in a hurry.

So for investors, I will suggest that one should pay more attention to the outlook for earnings and economic growth than the election - as far as investing in stocks and bonds are concerned, that is!

The literal bottom line is that while things may get sloppy in the near-term, there doesn't seem to be a reason to be defensive from a longer-term perspective. However, I will be sure to alert you if things appear to be changing.

Have a great weekend!

Current Market Drivers

We strive to identify the driving forces behind the market action on a daily basis. The thinking is that if we can both identify and understand why stocks are doing what they are doing on a short-term basis; we are not likely to be surprised/blind-sided by a big move. Listed below are what we believe to be the driving forces of the current market (Listed in order of importance).

      1. The State of Global Central Bank Policies
      2. The State of U.S. Economic Growth
      3. The State of Oil Prices

Thought For The Day:

The only disability in life is a bad attitude. -Scott Hamilton


Wishing you green screens and all the best for a great day,

David D. Moenning
Chief Investment Officer
Sowell Management Services

Follow @Sowell_MS

Looking for a "Modern" approach to Asset Allocation and Portfolio Design?

Looking for More on the State of the Markets?

Investment Pros: Looking to modernize your asset allocations, add risk management to client portfolios, or outsource portfolio design? Contact


The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning's opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

David D. Moenning is an investment adviser representative of Sowell Management Services, a registered investment advisor. For a complete description of investment risks, fees and services, review the firm brochure (ADV Part 2) which is available by contacting Sowell. Sowell is not registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of Sowell may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Positions may change at any time.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.

Advisory services are offered through Sowell Management Services.