Posted |

In yesterday's missive, we looked at what the decline in January might mean for the rest of the year. While it might seem incredible that the result from a single month of price action could have predictive powers, history shows this to be true. The bottom line is that when the S&P 500 sports a loss for the month of January, especially during January's following a strong return in the market the year before, the ensuing eleven months tend to be down.

The good news is that January is over. But the bad news, at least as far as our cycle work suggests, is that February has begun. After a punk January, the S&P started off February on a really lousy note. If I have the statistic right, Monday's shellacking was the worst first day of February since 1933. Ouch.

So, since everyone in the game right now is basically waiting for Friday's jobs report to either confirm that #growthslowing is a thing this year or that the worries have been misguided, we thought this would be a good time to take a peek at what the historical cycles say about what February may hold in store.

So let's get to it.

Time To Review The Cycle Projections

Since this is the thirteenth consecutive monthly review of the cycle composite, there is probably little need to go over all the disclosures/disclaimers again regarding the proper use of stock market cycle analysis. The bottom line is that the review of cycles should NOT be used in a vacuum or as a stand-alone indicator. Using only the cycle composite projection, or any other indicator for that matter, to guide your investing decisions is a fool's game.

With that said however, we continue to check out what the cycles suggest might happen on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. In fact, this data continues to be an important input into our daily and weekly Market Environment models.

What Is a Cycle Composite?

For anyone new to our monthly analysis of the cycles (the closest thing we have to a crystal ball), the cycle composite is a combination of the one-year seasonal, the four-year Presidential, and the 10-year decennial cycles - all going back to 1928.

By combining these three cycles, a cycle composite is produced. And while expecting the market to follow the cycles exactly is just plain silly, it is surprising how often the market tends to follow the general direction of the composite - especially when viewed from a long-term perspective.

Question #1: Is The Market In Sync With The Cycle Projections?

The first step in the analysis of the cycles is to get a feel for whether or not the cycle projections are "on" or not at the present time. Looking at how the market acted relative to the cycle composite's projection for January, we will have to answer the question with a resounding, "No!" as the stock market went almost exactly opposite the projection for last month.

Cycle Composite vs. S&P 500

In short, January is supposed to have been a steady march higher; not a rendition of Humpty Dumpty falling off the wall.

However, from a longer-term perspective, the market (as defined by the S&P 500) continues to be largely in sync with the composite projection. For example, since 2010, the S&P is only a percent or so away from where it has been projected to be at this time.

Sure, the ride has been bumpy and there have been times that the market has diverged - sometimes rather dramatically - from the projected path. But four years and a multitude of crises later, it is incredible that the market is still in sync with its historical cycles.

What Does February Look Like?

The next step is to take a look at what the cycle projections are calling for during the coming month:

Four-Year Cycle: The four-year Presidential cycle projection projects a bit of a problem for stocks in 2014. This is the second year of the President's term and the bottom line is there tends to be a rather substantial decline during this period. While the cycle projection doesn't suggest any real trouble until the second quarter, it is worth noting that the timing of such events are always flexible. Therefore, traders who follow such things are concerned that the meaningful decline being projected by the cycles may have started a little early.

The S&P 500 Cycle Composite: The overall cycle composite suggests that February will be somewhat negative affair. Although stocks are NOT following their cue right now from the cycle composite, the projection is for an early advance followed by a sharp pullback, a rally, and another decline.

Cycle Composite For S&P 500: January - February 2014

The NASDAQ's Cycle Composite: This year we're also going to take a look at what the cycle composite has to say about the NASDAQ each month. The reason being is that the projection for the tech-heavy NASDAQ Composite is very clear - a serious decline lies ahead. In short, starting in February, the NASDAQ is projected to trace out a saw-tooth decline that is briefly interrupted in March but is then pretty much straight down at a forty-five degree angle until October.

What's interesting is that while the S&P is running exactly opposite of its cycle projection at the present time, the NASDAQ is largely in line with its cycles. Sure, the decline we're seeing right now is worse than the cycle had called for. However, the conflicted projections between these two indices remains something to pay attention to this year.

In Sum

So to sum up, the S&P has been moving opposite the cycle composite while the NASDAQ is largely following the script. The good news here is that after a period of sideways consolidation, the next move the NASDAQ's cycle composite calls for is a rally.

The takeaway here is that this may be a year to play your cards close to the vest and to book profits whenever you have them.

Positions in stocks mentioned: none

The opinions and forecasts expressed herein are those of Mr. David Moenning and may not actually come to pass. Mr. Moenning’s opinions and viewpoints regarding the future of the markets should not be construed as recommendations. The analysis and information in this report is for informational purposes only. No part of the material presented in this report is intended as an investment recommendation or investment advice. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed nor any Portfolio constitutes a solicitation to purchase or sell securities or any investment program.

Any investment decisions must in all cases be made by the reader or by his or her investment adviser. Do NOT ever purchase any security without doing sufficient research. There is no guarantee that the investment objectives outlined will actually come to pass. All opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice. Neither the editor, employees, nor any of their affiliates shall have any liability for any loss sustained by anyone who has relied on the information provided.

The analysis provided is based on both technical and fundamental research and is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. Although the information contained is derived from sources which are believed to be reliable, they cannot be guaranteed.

The information contained in this report is provided by Ridge Publishing Co. Inc. (Ridge). One of the principals of Ridge, Mr. David Moenning, is also President and majority shareholder of Heritage Capital Management, Inc. (HCM) a Chicago-based money management firm. HCM is registered as an investment adviser. HCM also serves as a sub-advisor to other investment advisory firms. Ridge is a publisher and has not registered as an investment adviser. Neither HCM nor Ridge is registered as a broker-dealer.

Employees and affiliates of HCM and Ridge may at times have positions in the securities referred to and may make purchases or sales of these securities while publications are in circulation. Editors will indicate whether they or HCM has a position in stocks or other securities mentioned in any publication. The disclosures will be accurate as of the time of publication and may change thereafter without notice.

Investments in equities carry an inherent element of risk including the potential for significant loss of principal. Past performance is not an indication of future results.